- Two of the linters changed their names
- Updated code and nolint comments to make all linters pass with 1.44.2
- Added a new hack/install-linter.sh script to help developers install
the expected version of the linter for local development
Also:
- Make our code generator script work with Go 1.17
- Make our update.sh script work on linux
- Update the patch versions of the old Kube versions that we were using
to generate code (see kube-versions.txt)
- Use our container images from ghcr instead of
projects.registry.vmware.com for codegen purposes
- Make it easier to debug in the future by passing "-v" to the Kube
codegen scripts
- Updated copyright years to make commit checks pass
The purpose of this change is to allow Helm to be used to deploy Pinniped
into the local KinD cluster for the local integration tests. That said,
the change allows any alternate deployment mechanism, I just happen
to be using it with Helm.
All default behavior is preserved. This won't change how anyone uses the
script today, it just allows me not to copy/paste the whole setup for the
integration tests.
Changes:
1) An option called `--alternate-deploy <path-to-deploy-script>` has been
added, that when enabled calls the specified script instead of using ytt
and kapp. The alternate deploy script is called with the app to deploy
and the tag of the docker image to use. We set the default value of
the alternate_deploy variable to undefined, and there is a check that
tests if the alternate deploy is defined. For the superivsor it looks
like this:
```
if [ "$alternate_deploy" != "undefined" ]; then
log_note "The Pinniped Supervisor will be deployed with $alternate_deploy pinniped-supervisor $tag..."
$alternate_deploy pinniped-supervisor $tag
else
normal ytt/kapp deploy
fi
```
2) Additional log_note entries have been added to enumerate all values passed
into the ytt/kapp deploy. Used while I was trying to reach parity in the integration
tests, but I think they are useful for debugging.
3) The manifests produced by ytt and written to /tmp are now named individually.
This is so an easy comparison can be made between manifests produced by a ytt/kapp
run of integration tests and manifests produced by helm run of the integration tests.
If something is not working I have been comparing the manifests after these runs to
find differences.
