- Used to determine on which port the impersonation proxy will bind
- Defaults to 8444, which is the old hard-coded port value
- Allow the port number to be configured to any value within the
range 1024 to 65535
- This commit does not include adding new config knobs to the ytt
values file, so while it is possible to change this port without
needing to recompile, it is not convenient
This change fixes a copy paste error that led to the impersonation
proxy signer CA being rotated based on the configuration of the
rotation of the aggregated API serving certificate. This would lead
to occasional "Unauthorized" flakes in our CI environments that
rotate the serving certificate at a frequent interval.
Updated the certs_expirer controller logs to be more detailed.
Updated CA common names to be more specific (this does not update
any previously generated CAs).
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
In the upstream dynamiccertificates package, we rely on two pieces
of code:
1. DynamicServingCertificateController.newTLSContent which calls
- clientCA.CurrentCABundleContent
- servingCert.CurrentCertKeyContent
2. unionCAContent.VerifyOptions which calls
- unionCAContent.CurrentCABundleContent
This results in calls to our tlsServingCertDynamicCertProvider and
impersonationSigningCertProvider. If we Unset these providers, we
subtly break these consumers. At best this results in test slowness
and flakes while we wait for reconcile loops to converge. At worst,
it results in actual errors during runtime. For example, we
previously would Unset the impersonationSigningCertProvider on any
sync loop error (even a transient one caused by a network blip or
a conflict between writes from different replicas of the concierge).
This would cause us to transiently fail to issue new certificates
from the token credential require API. It would also cause us to
transiently fail to authenticate previously issued client certs
(which results in occasional Unauthorized errors in CI).
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
Prior to this fix, this controller did not correctly react to changes to the ClusterIP service. It would still eventually react with a long delay due to our 5 minute resync interval.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
When a CredentialIssuer is switched from one service type to another (or switched to disabled mode), the `impersonatorconfig` controller will delete the previous Service, if any. Normally one Concierge pod will succeed to delete this initially and any other pods will see a NotFound error.
Before this change, the NotFound would bubble up and cause the strategy to enter a ErrorDuringSetup status until the next reconcile loop. We now handle this case without reporting an error.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
These are tricky because a real load balancer controller (e.g., on GKE) will overwrite and set NodePort, so we can't blindly set the desired state of this fields.
For now, we will just skip reconciling these. In the future, we could be more clever about merging them together with the current state.
Signed-off-by: Margo Crawford <margaretc@vmware.com>
This updates the code to use a different mechanism for driving desired state:
- Read existing object
- If it does not exist, create desired object
- If it does exist, make a copy and set all the desired fields
- Do a deepequal to see if an update is necessary.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
We also no longer need an initial event, since we don't do anything unless the CredentialIssuer exists, so we'll always be triggered at the appropriate time.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
We were previously issuing both client certs and server certs with
both extended key usages included. Split the Issue*() methods into
separate methods for issuing server certs versus client certs so
they can have different extended key usages tailored for each use
case.
Also took the opportunity to clean up the parameters of the Issue*()
methods and New() methods to more closely match how we prefer to call
them. We were always only passing the common name part of the
pkix.Name to New(), so now the New() method just takes the common name
as a string. When making a server cert, we don't need to set the
deprecated common name field, so remove that param. When making a client
cert, we're always making it in the format expected by the Kube API
server, so just accept the username and group as parameters directly.
To make an impersonation request, first make a TokenCredentialRequest
to get a certificate. That cert will either be issued by the Kube
API server's CA or by a new CA specific to the impersonator. Either
way, you can then make a request to the impersonator and present
that client cert for auth and the impersonator will accept it and
make the impesonation call on your behalf.
The impersonator http handler now borrows some Kube library code
to handle request processing. This will allow us to more closely
mimic the behavior of a real API server, e.g. the client cert
auth will work exactly like the real API server.
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
- This commit does not include the updates that we plan to make to
the `status.strategies[].frontend` field of the CredentialIssuer.
That will come in a future commit.
- The CA cert will end up in the end user's kubeconfig on their client
machine, so if it changes they would need to fetch the new one and
update their kubeconfig. Therefore, we should avoid changing it as
much as possible.
- Now the controller writes the CA to a different Secret. It writes both
the cert and the key so it can reuse them to create more TLS
certificates in the future.
- For now, it only needs to make more TLS certificates if the old
TLS cert Secret gets deleted or updated to be invalid. This allows
for manual rotation of the TLS certs by simply deleting the Secret.
In the future, we may want to implement some kind of auto rotation.
- For now, rotation of both the CA and TLS certs will also happen if
you manually delete the CA Secret. However, this would cause the end
users to immediately need to get the new CA into their kubeconfig,
so this is not as elegant as a normal rotation flow where you would
have a window of time where you have more than one CA.
Ryan Richard