The value is correctly validated as `secrets.pinniped.dev/oidc-client` elsewhere, only this comment was wrong.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
- Refactor the test to avoid testing a private method and instead
always test the results of running the controller.
- Also remove the `if testing.Short()` check because it will always
be short when running unit tests. This prevented the unit test
from ever running, both locally and in CI.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
It now tests both the deprecated `pinniped get-kubeconfig` and the new `pinniped get kubeconfig --static-token` flows.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
This is extracted from library.NewClientsetForKubeConfig(). It is useful so you can assert properties of the loaded, parsed kubeconfig.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
- Adds two new subcommands: `pinniped get kubeconfig` and `pinniped login static`
- Adds concierge support to `pinniped login oidc`.
- Adds back wrapper commands for the now deprecated `pinniped get-kubeconfig` and `pinniped exchange-credential` commands. These now wrap `pinniped get kubeconfig` and `pinniped login static` respectively.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
This is a slighly evolved version of our previous client package, exported to be public and refactored to use functional options for API maintainability.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
I hope this will make TestSupervisorLogin less flaky. There are some instances
where the front half of the OIDC login flow happens so fast that the JWKS
controller doesn't have time to properly generate an asymmetric key.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
I saw this message in our CI logs, which led me to this fix.
could not update status: OIDCProvider.config.supervisor.pinniped.dev "acceptance-provider" is invalid: status.status: Unsupported value: "SameIssuerHostMustUseSameSecret": supported values: "Success", "Duplicate", "Invalid"
Also - correct an integration test error message that was misleading.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
We believe this API is more forwards compatible with future secrets management
use cases. The implementation is a cry for help, but I was trying to follow the
previously established pattern of encapsulating the secret generation
functionality to a single group of packages.
This commit makes a breaking change to the current OIDCProvider API, but that
OIDCProvider API was added after the latest release, so it is technically still
in development until we release, and therefore we can continue to thrash on it.
I also took this opportunity to make some things private that didn't need to be
public.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
