When using kind we forward the node's port to the host, so we only
really care about the `nodePort` value. For acceptance clusters,
we put an Ingress in front of a NodePort Service, so we only really
care about the `port` value.
Based on our experiences today with GKE, it will be easier for our users
to configure Ingress health checks if the healthz endpoint is available
on the same public port as the OIDC endpoints.
Also add an integration test for the healthz endpoint now that it is
public.
Also add the optional `containers[].ports.containerPort` to the
supervisor Deployment because the GKE docs say that GKE will look
at that field while inferring how to invoke the health endpoint. See
https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/ingress#def_inf_hc
- New optional ytt value called `into_namespace` means install into that
preexisting namespace rather than creating a new namespace for each app
- Also ensure that every resource that is created statically by our yaml
at install-time by either app is labeled consistently
- Also support adding custom labels to all of those resources from a
new ytt value called `custom_labels`
- Tiltfile and prepare-for-integration-tests.sh both specify the
NodePort Service using `--data-value-yaml 'service_nodeport_port=31234'`
- Also rename the namespaces used by the Concierge and Supervisor apps
during integration tests running locally
- Also continue renaming things related to the concierge app
- Enhance the uninstall test to also test uninstalling the supervisor
and local-user-authenticator apps
This will hopefully come in handy later if we ever decide to add
support for multiple OIDC providers as a part of one supervisor.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This needs to be overridden for Tilt usage, since the main image referenced by Tilt isn't actually pullable.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
Right now in the YTT templates we assume that the agent pods are gonna use
the same image as the main Pinniped deployment, so we can use the same logic
for the image pull secrets.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
New resource naming conventions:
- Do not repeat the Kind in the name,
e.g. do not call it foo-cluster-role-binding, just call it foo
- Names will generally start with a prefix to identify our component,
so when a user lists all objects of that kind, they can tell to which
component it is related,
e.g. `kubectl get configmaps` would list one named "pinniped-config"
- It should be possible for an operator to make the word "pinniped"
mostly disappear if they choose, by specifying the app_name in
values.yaml, to the extent that is practical (but not from APIService
names because those are hardcoded in golang)
- Each role/clusterrole and its corresponding binding have the same name
- Pinniped resource names that must be known by the server golang code
are passed to the code at run time via ConfigMap, rather than
hardcoded in the golang code. This also allows them to be prepended
with the app_name from values.yaml while creating the ConfigMap.
- Since the CLI `get-kubeconfig` command cannot guess the name of the
CredentialIssuerConfig resource in advance anymore, it lists all
CredentialIssuerConfig in the app's namespace and returns an error
if there is not exactly one found, and then uses that one regardless
of its name
- For now, build the test-webhook binary in the same container image as
the pinniped-server binary, to make it easier to distribute
- Also fix lots of bugs from the first draft of the test-webhook's
`/authenticate` implementation from the previous commit
- Add a detailed README for the new deploy-test-webhook directory
- We are not setting an upper limit because Kubernetes might randomly
decide to unschedule our pod in ways that we can't anticipate in
advance, causing very hard to reproduce production bugs.
- We noticed that our app currently uses ~30 MB of memory when idle,
and ~35 MB of memory under some load. So a memory request of 128
MB should be reasonable.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
