- Setting a Secret in the supervisor's namespace with a special name
will cause it to get picked up and served as the supervisor's TLS
cert for any request which does not have a matching SNI cert.
- This is especially useful for when there is no DNS record for an
issuer and the user will be accessing it via IP address. This
is not how we would expect it to be used in production, but it
might be useful for other cases.
- Includes a new integration test
- Also suppress all of the warnings about ignoring the error returned by
Close() in lines like `defer x.Close()` to make GoLand happier
So that operators won't look at the lifetime of the CA cert and be
like, "wtf, why does the serving cert have the lifetime that I
specified, but its CA cert is valid for 100 years".
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
We are seeing between 1 and 2 minutes of difference between the current time
reported in the API server pod and the pinniped pods on one of our testing
environments. Hopefully this change makes our tests pass again.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This switches us back to an approach where we use the Pod "exec" API to grab the keys we need, rather than forcing our code to run on the control plane node. It will help us fail gracefully (or dynamically switch to alternate implementations) when the cluster is not self-hosted.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
The error was:
```
internal/certauthority/certauthority.go:68:15: err113: do not define dynamic errors, use wrapped static errors instead: "fmt.Errorf(\"expected CA to be a single certificate, found %d certificates\", certCount)" (goerr113)
return nil, fmt.Errorf("expected CA to be a single certificate, found %d certificates", certCount)
^
exit status 1
```
I'm not sure if I love this err113 linter.
I think we may still split this apart into multiple packages, but for now it works pretty well in both use cases.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
Matt Moyer