- changed to use custom authenticators.Response rather than the k8s one
that doesn't include space for a DN
- Added more checking for correct idp type in token handler
- small style changes
Signed-off-by: Margo Crawford <margaretc@vmware.com>
This stores the user DN in the session data upon login and checks that
the entry still exists upon refresh. It doesn't check anything
else about the entry yet.
- Requiring refresh tokens to be returned from upstream OIDC idps
- Storing refresh tokens (for oidc) and idp information (for all idps) in custom session data during authentication
- Don't pass access=offline all the time
- throw an error when prompt=none because the spec says we can't ignore
it
- ignore the other prompt params
Signed-off-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
This will allow us to store custom data inside the fosite session
storage for all downstream OIDC sessions.
Signed-off-by: Margo Crawford <margaretc@vmware.com>
- Add `AllowPasswordGrant` boolean field to OIDCIdentityProvider's spec
- The oidc upstream watcher controller copies the value of
`AllowPasswordGrant` into the configuration of the cached provider
- Add password grant to the UpstreamOIDCIdentityProviderI interface
which is implemented by the cached provider instance for use in the
authorization endpoint
- Enhance the IDP discovery endpoint to return the supported "flows"
for each IDP ("cli_password" and/or "browser_authcode")
- Enhance `pinniped get kubeconfig` to help the user choose the desired
flow for the selected IDP, and to write the flow into the resulting
kubeconfg
- Enhance `pinniped login oidc` to have a flow flag to tell it which
client-side flow it should use for auth (CLI-based or browser-based)
- In the Dex config, allow the resource owner password grant, which Dex
implements to also return ID tokens, for use in integration tests
- Enhance the authorize endpoint to perform password grant when
requested by the incoming headers. This commit does not include unit
tests for the enhancements to the authorize endpoint, which will come
in the next commit
- Extract some shared helpers from the callback endpoint to share the
code with the authorize endpoint
- Add new integration tests
See RFC6648 which asks that people stop using `X-` on header names.
Also Matt preferred not mentioning "IDP" in the header name.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
- Bad usernames and passwords aren't really errors, since they are
based on end-user input.
- Other kinds of authentication failures are caused by bad configuration
so still treat those as errors.
- Empty usernames and passwords are already prevented by our endpoint
handler, but just to be safe make sure they cause errors inside the
authenticator too.
- When the upstream IDP is an LDAP IDP and the user's LDAP username and
password are received as new custom headers, then authenticate the
user and, if authentication was successful, return a redirect with
an authcode. Handle errors according to the OAuth/OIDC specs.
- Still does not support having multiple upstream IDPs defined at the
same time, which was an existing limitation of this endpoint.
- Does not yet include the actual LDAP authentication, which is
hidden behind an interface from the point of view of auth_handler.go
- Move the oidctestutil package to the testutil directory.
- Add an interface for Fosite storage to avoid a cyclical test
dependency.
- Add GetURL() to the UpstreamLDAPIdentityProviderI interface.
- Extract test helpers to be shared between callback_handler_test.go
and auth_handler_test.go because the authcode and fosite storage
assertions should be identical.
- Backfill Content-Type assertions in callback_handler_test.go.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This is a bit more clear. We're changing this now because it is a non-backwards-compatible change that we can make now since none of this RFC8693 token exchange stuff has been released yet.
There is also a small typo fix in some flag usages (s/RF8693/RFC8693/)
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
We opened https://github.com/vmware-tanzu/pinniped/issues/254 for the TODO in
dynamicOpenIDConnectECDSAStrategy.GenerateToken().
This commit also ensures that linting and unit tests are passing again.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This CSRF cookie needs to be included on the request to the callback endpoint triggered by the redirect from the OIDC upstream provider. This is not allowed by `Same-Site=Strict` but is allowed by `Same-Site=Lax` because it is a "cross-site top-level navigation" [1].
We didn't catch this earlier with our Dex-based tests because the upstream and downstream issuers were on the same parent domain `*.svc.cluster.local` so the cookie was allowed even with `Strict` mode.
[1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-same-site-00#section-3.2
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
Generate a new cookie for the user and move on as if they had not sent
a bad cookie. Hopefully this will make the user experience better if,
for example, the server rotated cookie signing keys and then a user
submitted a very old cookie.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This is much nicer UX for an administrator installing a UpstreamOIDCProvider
CRD. They don't have to guess as hard at what the callback endpoint path should
be for their UpstreamOIDCProvider.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Because we want it to implement an AuthcodeExchanger interface and
do it in a way that will be more unit test-friendly than the underlying
library that we intend to use inside its implementation.
This will allow it to be imported by Go code outside of our repository, which was something we have planned for since this code was written.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
- To better support having multiple downstream providers configured,
the authorize endpoint will share a CSRF cookie between all
downstream providers' authorize endpoints. The first time a
user's browser hits the authorize endpoint of any downstream
provider, that endpoint will set the cookie. Then if the user
starts an authorize flow with that same downstream provider or with
any other downstream provider which shares the same domain name
(i.e. differentiated by issuer path), then the same cookie will be
submitted and respected.
- Just in case we are sharing the domain name with some other app,
we sign the value of any new CSRF cookie and check the signature
when we receive the cookie. This wasn't strictly necessary since
we probably won't share a domain name with other apps, but it
wasn't hard to add this cookie signing.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
