- TLS certificates can be configured on the OIDCProviderConfig using
the `secretName` field.
- When listening for incoming TLS connections, choose the TLS cert
based on the SNI hostname of the incoming request.
- Because SNI hostname information on incoming requests does not include
the port number of the request, we add a validation that
OIDCProviderConfigs where the issuer hostnames (not including port
number) are the same must use the same `secretName`.
- Note that this approach does not yet support requests made to an
IP address instead of a hostname. Also note that `localhost` is
considered a hostname by SNI.
- Add port 443 as a container port to the pod spec.
- A new controller watches for TLS secrets and caches them in memory.
That same in-memory cache is used while servicing incoming connections
on the TLS port.
- Make it easy to configure both port 443 and/or port 80 for various
Service types using our ytt templates for the supervisor.
- When deploying to kind, add another nodeport and forward it to the
host on another port to expose our new HTTPS supervisor port to the
host.
- When two different Issuers have the same host (i.e. they differ
only by path) then they must have the same secretName. This is because
it wouldn't make sense for there to be two different TLS certificates
for one host. Find any that do not have the same secret name to
put an error status on them and to avoid serving OIDC endpoints for
them. The host comparison is case-insensitive.
- Issuer hostnames should be treated as case-insensitive, because
DNS hostnames are case-insensitive. So https://me.com and
https://mE.cOm are duplicate issuers. However, paths are
case-sensitive, so https://me.com/A and https://me.com/a are
different issuers. Fixed this in the issuer validations and in the
OIDC Manager's request router logic.
This was hidden behind a `pinniped alpha` hidden subcommand, but we're comfortable enough with the CLI flag interface now to promote it.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
When using kind we forward the node's port to the host, so we only
really care about the `nodePort` value. For acceptance clusters,
we put an Ingress in front of a NodePort Service, so we only really
care about the `port` value.
Based on our experiences today with GKE, it will be easier for our users
to configure Ingress health checks if the healthz endpoint is available
on the same public port as the OIDC endpoints.
Also add an integration test for the healthz endpoint now that it is
public.
Also add the optional `containers[].ports.containerPort` to the
supervisor Deployment because the GKE docs say that GKE will look
at that field while inferring how to invoke the health endpoint. See
https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/ingress#def_inf_hc
- Not used by any of our integration test clusters yet
- Planning to use it later for the kind clusters and maybe for
the acceptance clusters too (although the acceptance clusters might
not need to use self-signed certs so maybe not)
- It didn't matter before because it would be cleaned up by a
t.Cleanup() function, but now that we might loop twice it will matter
during the second time through the loop
EC keys are smaller and take less time to generate. Our integration
tests were super flakey because generating an RSA key would take up to
10 seconds *gasp*. The main token verifier that we care about is
Kubernetes, which supports P256, so hopefully it won't be that much of
an issue that our default signing key type is EC. The OIDC spec seems
kinda squirmy when it comes to using non-RSA signing algorithms...
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
