I'm worried that these errors are going to be really burried from the user, so
add some log statements to try to make them a tiny bit more observable.
Also follow some of our error message convetions by using lowercase error
messages.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This CSRF cookie needs to be included on the request to the callback endpoint triggered by the redirect from the OIDC upstream provider. This is not allowed by `Same-Site=Strict` but is allowed by `Same-Site=Lax` because it is a "cross-site top-level navigation" [1].
We didn't catch this earlier with our Dex-based tests because the upstream and downstream issuers were on the same parent domain `*.svc.cluster.local` so the cookie was allowed even with `Strict` mode.
[1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-same-site-00#section-3.2
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
This commit includes a failing test (amongst other compiler failures) for the
dynamic signing key fetcher that we will inject into fosite. We are checking it
in so that we can pass the WIP off.
Signed-off-by: Margo Crawford <margaretc@vmware.com>
We are currently using EC keys to sign ID tokens, so we should reflect that in
our OIDC discovery metadata.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
We missed this in the original interface specification, but the `grant_type=authorization_code` requires it, per RFC6749 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-4.1.3).
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
- Note that this WIP commit includes a failing unit test, which will
be addressed in the next commit
Signed-off-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
Generate a new cookie for the user and move on as if they had not sent
a bad cookie. Hopefully this will make the user experience better if,
for example, the server rotated cookie signing keys and then a user
submitted a very old cookie.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Also use ConstantTimeCompare() to compare CSRF tokens to prevent
leaking any information in how quickly we reject bad tokens.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
This is much nicer UX for an administrator installing a UpstreamOIDCProvider
CRD. They don't have to guess as hard at what the callback endpoint path should
be for their UpstreamOIDCProvider.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Also aggresively refactor for readability:
- Make helper validations functions for each type of storage
- Try to label symbols based on their downstream/upstream use and group them
accordingly
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
- Also handle several more error cases
- Move RequireTimeInDelta to shared testutils package so other tests
can also use it
- Move all of the oidc test helpers into a new oidc/oidctestutils
package to break a circular import dependency. The shared testutil
package can't depend on any of our other packages or else we
end up with circular dependencies.
- Lots more assertions about what was stored at the end of the
request to build confidence that we are going to pass all of the
right settings over to the token endpoint through the storage, and
also to avoid accidental regressions in that area in the future
Signed-off-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
Also refactor to get rid of duplicate test structs.
Also also don't default groups ID token claim because there is no standard one.
Also also also add some logging that will hopefully help us in debugging in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Because we want it to implement an AuthcodeExchanger interface and
do it in a way that will be more unit test-friendly than the underlying
library that we intend to use inside its implementation.
This will allow it to be imported by Go code outside of our repository, which was something we have planned for since this code was written.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
