Also:
- Shut down the informer correctly in
concierge_impersonation_proxy_test.go
- Remove the t.Failed() checks which avoid cleaning up after failed
tests. This was inconsistent with how most of the tests work, and
left cruft on clusters when a test failed.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
Also:
- Changed base64 encoding of impersonator bearer tokens to use
`base64.StdEncoding` to make it easier for users to manually
create a token using the unix `base64` command
- Test the headers which are and are not passed through to the Kube API
by the impersonator more carefully in the unit tests
- More WIP on concierge_impersonation_proxy_test.go
Signed-off-by: Margo Crawford <margaretc@vmware.com>
This change adds a new virtual aggregated API that can be used by
any user to echo back who they are currently authenticated as. This
has general utility to end users and can be used in tests to
validate if authentication was successful.
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
I think we were assuming the name of our Concierge app, and getting lucky
because it was the name we use when testing locally (but not in CI).
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
- Watch a configmap to read the configuration of the impersonation
proxy and reconcile it.
- Implements "auto" mode by querying the API for control plane nodes.
- WIP: does not create a load balancer or proper TLS certificates yet.
Those will come in future commits.
Signed-off-by: Margo Crawford <margaretc@vmware.com>
This is a partial revert of 288d9c999e. For some reason it didn't occur to me
that we could do it this way earlier. Whoops.
This also contains a middleware update: mutation funcs can return an error now
and short-circuit the rest of the request/response flow. The idea here is that
if someone is configuring their kubeclient to use middleware, they are agreeing
to a narrow-er client contract by doing so (e.g., their TokenCredentialRequest's
must have an Spec.Authenticator.APIGroup set).
I also updated some internal/groupsuffix tests to be more realistic.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
I think the reason we were seeing flakes here is because the kube cert agent
pods had not reached a steady state even though our test assertions passed, so
the test would proceed immediately and run more assertions on top of a weird
state of the kube cert agent pods.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This allows us to keep all of our resources in the pinniped category
while not having kubectl return errors for calls such as:
kubectl get pinniped -A
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
Because it is a test of the conciergeclient package, and the naming
convention for integration test files is supervisor_*_test.go,
concierge_*_test.go, or cli_*_test.go to identify which component
the test is primarily covering.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Yes, this is a huge commit.
The middleware allows you to customize the API groups of all of the
*.pinniped.dev API groups.
Some notes about other small things in this commit:
- We removed the internal/client package in favor of pkg/conciergeclient. The
two packages do basically the same thing. I don't think we use the former
anymore.
- We re-enabled cluster-scoped owner assertions in the integration tests.
This code was added in internal/ownerref. See a0546942 for when this
assertion was removed.
- Note: the middlware code is in charge of restoring the GV of a request object,
so we should never need to write mutations that do that.
- We updated the supervisor secret generation to no longer manually set an owner
reference to the deployment since the middleware code now does this. I think we
still need some way to make an initial event for the secret generator
controller, which involves knowing the namespace and the name of the generated
secret, so I still wired the deployment through. We could use a namespace/name
tuple here, but I was lazy.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
The group claims read from the session cache file are loaded as `[]interface{}` (slice of empty interfaces) so when we previously did a `groups, _ := idTokenClaims[oidc.DownstreamGroupsClaim].([]string)`, then `groups` would always end up nil.
The solution I tried here was to convert the expected value to also be `[]interface{}` so that `require.Equal(t, ...)` does the right thing.
This bug only showed up in our acceptance environnment against Okta, since we don't have any other integration test coverage with IDPs that pass a groups claim.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
We were seeing a race in this test code since the require.NoError() and
require.Eventually() would write to the same testing.T state on separate
goroutines. Hopefully this helper function should cover the cases when we want
to require.NoError() inside a require.Eventually() without causing a race.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Margo Crawford <margaretc@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Monis Khan <i@monis.app>
This change updates our clients to always set an owner ref when:
1. The operation is a create
2. The object does not already have an owner ref set
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
See comment. This is at least a first step to make our GKE acceptance
environment greener. Previously, this test assumed that the Pinniped-under-test
had been deployed in (roughly) the last 10 minutes, which is not an assumption
that we make anywhere else in the integration test suite.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
- Only sync on add/update of secrets in the same namespace which
have the "storage.pinniped.dev/garbage-collect-after" annotation, and
also during a full resync of the informer whenever secrets in the
same namespace with that annotation exist.
- Ignore deleted secrets to avoid having this controller trigger itself
unnecessarily when it deletes a secret. This controller is never
interested in deleted secrets, since its only job is to delete
existing secrets.
- No change to the self-imposed rate limit logic. That still applies
because secrets with this annotation will be created and updated
regularly while the system is running (not just during rare system
configuration steps).
