- I realized that the hardcoded fakekubeapi 404 not found response was invalid,
so we were getting a default error message. I fixed it so the tests follow a
higher fidelity code path.
- I caved and added a test for making sure the request body was always closed,
and believe it or not, we were double closing a body. I don't *think* this will
matter in production, since client-go will pass us ioutil.NopReader()'s, but
at least we know now.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Yes, this is a huge commit.
The middleware allows you to customize the API groups of all of the
*.pinniped.dev API groups.
Some notes about other small things in this commit:
- We removed the internal/client package in favor of pkg/conciergeclient. The
two packages do basically the same thing. I don't think we use the former
anymore.
- We re-enabled cluster-scoped owner assertions in the integration tests.
This code was added in internal/ownerref. See a0546942 for when this
assertion was removed.
- Note: the middlware code is in charge of restoring the GV of a request object,
so we should never need to write mutations that do that.
- We updated the supervisor secret generation to no longer manually set an owner
reference to the deployment since the middleware code now does this. I think we
still need some way to make an initial event for the secret generator
controller, which involves knowing the namespace and the name of the generated
secret, so I still wired the deployment through. We could use a namespace/name
tuple here, but I was lazy.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
This reverts commit 4a28d1f800.
This commit was originally made to fix a bug that caused TokenCredentialRequest
to become slow when the server was idle for an extended period of time. This was
to address a Kubernetes issue that was fixed in 1.19.5 and onward. We are now
running with Kubernetes 1.20, so we should be able to pick up this fix.
This change updates our clients to always set an owner ref when:
1. The operation is a create
2. The object does not already have an owner ref set
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
- JWKSWriterController
- JWKSObserverController
- FederationDomainSecretsController for HMAC keys
- FederationDomainSecretsController for state signature key
- FederationDomainSecretsController for state encryption key
Signed-off-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
- Only sync on add/update of secrets in the same namespace which
have the "storage.pinniped.dev/garbage-collect-after" annotation, and
also during a full resync of the informer whenever secrets in the
same namespace with that annotation exist.
- Ignore deleted secrets to avoid having this controller trigger itself
unnecessarily when it deletes a secret. This controller is never
interested in deleted secrets, since its only job is to delete
existing secrets.
- No change to the self-imposed rate limit logic. That still applies
because secrets with this annotation will be created and updated
regularly while the system is running (not just during rare system
configuration steps).
We stared at this very carefully and we don't think there are any structural changes. Maybe something small happened to get the RNG off by one?
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
This implementation is janky because I wanted to make the smallest change
possible to try to get the code back to stable so we can release.
Also deep copy an object so we aren't mutating the cache.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This is a bit more clear. We're changing this now because it is a non-backwards-compatible change that we can make now since none of this RFC8693 token exchange stuff has been released yet.
There is also a small typo fix in some flag usages (s/RF8693/RFC8693/)
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
Fosite overrides the `Cache-Control` header we set, which is basically fine even though it's not exactly what we want.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
From RFC2616 (https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec4.html#sec4.2):
> It MUST be possible to combine the multiple header fields into one "field-name: field-value" pair,
> without changing the semantics of the message, by appending each subsequent field-value to the first,
> each separated by a comma.
This was correct before, but this simplifes a bit and shaves off a few bytes from the response.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
