I saw this message in our CI logs, which led me to this fix.
could not update status: OIDCProvider.config.supervisor.pinniped.dev "acceptance-provider" is invalid: status.status: Unsupported value: "SameIssuerHostMustUseSameSecret": supported values: "Success", "Duplicate", "Invalid"
Also - correct an integration test error message that was misleading.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
We want to have our APIs respond to `kubectl get pinniped`, and we shouldn't use `all` because we don't think most average users should have permission to see our API types, which means if we put our types there, they would get an error from `kubectl get all`.
I also added some tests to assert these properties on all `*.pinniped.dev` API resources.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
These only really make sense for aggregated API types where we need `conversion-gen` to do version conversion.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
This is the first of a few related changes that re-organize our API after the big recent changes that introduced the supervisor component.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
- When two different Issuers have the same host (i.e. they differ
only by path) then they must have the same secretName. This is because
it wouldn't make sense for there to be two different TLS certificates
for one host. Find any that do not have the same secret name to
put an error status on them and to avoid serving OIDC endpoints for
them. The host comparison is case-insensitive.
- Issuer hostnames should be treated as case-insensitive, because
DNS hostnames are case-insensitive. So https://me.com and
https://mE.cOm are duplicate issuers. However, paths are
case-sensitive, so https://me.com/A and https://me.com/a are
different issuers. Fixed this in the issuer validations and in the
OIDC Manager's request router logic.
This will hopefully come in handy later if we ever decide to add
support for multiple OIDC providers as a part of one supervisor.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This is essentially meant to be be "v1alpha2" of the existing CredentialRequest API, but since we want to move API groups we can just start over at v1alpha1.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
