I saw this helper function the other day and wondered if we could use it.
It does indeed look like it does what we want, because when I run this code,
I get `...User "system:anonymous" cannot get resource...`.
c := library.NewAnonymousPinnipedClientset(t)
_, err := c.
ConfigV1alpha1().
CredentialIssuerConfigs("integration").
Get(context.Background(), "pinniped-config", metav1.GetOptions{})
t.Log(err)
I also ran a similar test using this new helper in the context of
library.NewClientsetWithCertAndKey(). Seemed to get us what we want.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This change replaces our previous test helpers for checking cluster capabilities and passing external test parameters. Prior to this change, we always used `$PINNIPED_*` environment variables and these variables were accessed throughout the test code.
The new code introduces a more strongly-typed `TestEnv` structure and helpers which load and expose the parameters. Tests can now call `env := library.IntegrationEnv(t)`, then access parameters such as `env.Namespace` or `env.TestUser.Token`. This should make this data dependency easier to manage and refactor in the future. In many ways this is just an extended version of the previous cluster capabilities YAML.
Tests can also check for cluster capabilities easily by using `env := library.IntegrationEnv(t).WithCapability(xyz)`.
The actual parameters are still loaded from OS environment variables by default (for compatibility), but the code now also tries to load the data from a Kubernetes Secret (`integration/pinniped-test-env` by default). I'm hoping this will be a more convenient way to pass data between various scripts than the local `/tmp` directory. I hope to remove the OS environment code in a future commit.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
This should fix integration tests running on clusters that don't have
visible controller manager pods (e.g., GKE). Pinniped should boot, not
find any controller manager pods, but still post a status in the CIC.
I also updated a test helper so that we could tell the difference
between when an event was not added and when an event was added with
an empty key.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Right now in the YTT templates we assume that the agent pods are gonna use
the same image as the main Pinniped deployment, so we can use the same logic
for the image pull secrets.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This seems to fail on CI when the Concourse workers get slow and
kind stops working reliably. It would be interesting to see the
error message in that case to figure out if there's anything we
could do to make the test more resilient.
Simplifies the implementation, makes it more consistent with other
updaters of the cic (CredentialIssuerConfig), and also retries on
update conflicts
Signed-off-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
- Only inject things through the constructor that the controller
will need
- Use pkg private constants when possible for things that are not
actually configurable by the user
- Make the agent pod template private to the pkg
- Introduce a test helper to reduce some duplicated test code
- Remove some `it.Focus` lines that were accidentally committed, and
repair the broken tests that they were hiding
I think we want to reconcile on these pod template fields so that if
someone were to redeploy Pinniped with a new image for the agent, the
agent would get updated immediately. Before this change, the agent image
wouldn't get updated until the agent pod was deleted.
This thing is supposed to be used to help our CredentialRequest handler issue certs with a dynamic
CA keypair.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
3 main reasons:
- The cert and key that we store in this object are not always used for TLS.
- The package name "provider" was a little too generic.
- dynamiccert.Provider reads more go-ish than provider.DynamicCertProvider.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
- Lots of TODOs added that need to be resolved to finish this WIP
- execer_test.go seems like it should be passing, but it fails (sigh)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Annotations do not have this restriction, so we can put it there instead. This only currently occurs on clusters without the cluster signing capability (GKE).
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
