Add new deprecated_insecure_accept_external_unencrypted_http_requests
value in values.yaml. Allow it to be a boolean or a string to make it
easier to use (both --data-value and --data-value-yaml will work).
Also:
- Consider "ip6-localhost" and "ip6-loopback" to be loopback addresses
for the validation
- Remove unused env.SupervisorHTTPAddress var
- Deprecate the `service_http_*` values in values.yaml by renaming them
and causing a ytt render error when the old names are used
- Two of the linters changed their names
- Updated code and nolint comments to make all linters pass with 1.44.2
- Added a new hack/install-linter.sh script to help developers install
the expected version of the linter for local development
This allows us to target browser based tests with the regex:
go test -v -race -count 1 -timeout 0 ./test/integration -run '/_Browser'
New tests that call browsertest.Open will automatically be forced to
follow this convention.
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
This change updates the TLS config used by all pinniped components.
There are no configuration knobs associated with this change. Thus
this change tightens our static defaults.
There are four TLS config levels:
1. Secure (TLS 1.3 only)
2. Default (TLS 1.2+ best ciphers that are well supported)
3. Default LDAP (TLS 1.2+ with less good ciphers)
4. Legacy (currently unused, TLS 1.2+ with all non-broken ciphers)
Highlights per component:
1. pinniped CLI
- uses "secure" config against KAS
- uses "default" for all other connections
2. concierge
- uses "secure" config as an aggregated API server
- uses "default" config as a impersonation proxy API server
- uses "secure" config against KAS
- uses "default" config for JWT authenticater (mostly, see code)
- no changes to webhook authenticater (see code)
3. supervisor
- uses "default" config as a server
- uses "secure" config against KAS
- uses "default" config against OIDC IDPs
- uses "default LDAP" config against LDAP IDPs
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
Those images that are pulled from Dockerhub will cause pull failures
on some test clusters due to Dockerhub rate limiting.
Because we already have some images that we use for testing, and
because those images are already pre-loaded onto our CI clusters
to make the tests faster, use one of those images and always specify
PullIfNotPresent to avoid pulling the image again during the integration
test.
At a high level, it switches us to a distroless base container image, but that also includes several related bits:
- Add a writable /tmp but make the rest of our filesystems read-only at runtime.
- Condense our main server binaries into a single pinniped-server binary. This saves a bunch of space in
the image due to duplicated library code. The correct behavior is dispatched based on `os.Args[0]`, and
the `pinniped-server` binary is symlinked to `pinniped-concierge` and `pinniped-supervisor`.
- Strip debug symbols from our binaries. These aren't really useful in a distroless image anyway and all the
normal stuff you'd expect to work, such as stack traces, still does.
- Add a separate `pinniped-concierge-kube-cert-agent` binary with "sleep" and "print" functionality instead of
using builtin /bin/sleep and /bin/cat for the kube-cert-agent. This is split from the main server binary
because the loading/init time of the main server binary was too large for the tiny resource footprint we
established in our kube-cert-agent PodSpec. Using a separate binary eliminates this issue and the extra
binary adds only around 1.5MiB of image size.
- Switch the kube-cert-agent code to use a JSON `{"tls.crt": "<b64 cert>", "tls.key": "<b64 key>"}` format.
This is more robust to unexpected input formatting than the old code, which simply concatenated the files
with some extra newlines and split on whitespace.
- Update integration tests that made now-invalid assumptions about the `pinniped-server` image.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
TestSimultaneousLDAPRequestsOnSingleProvider proved to be unreliable
on AKS due to some kind of kubectl port-forward issue, so only
run the LDAP client's integration tests on Kind. They are testing
the integration between the client code and the OpenLDAP test server,
not testing anything about Kubernetes, so running only on Kind should
give us sufficient test coverage.
