This forced us to add labels to the CSRF cookie secret, just as we do
for other Supervisor secrets. Yay tests.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
- Also add more log statements to the controller
- Also have the controller apply a rate limit to itself, to avoid
having a very chatty controller that runs way more often than is
needed.
- Also add an integration test for the controller's behavior.
Signed-off-by: Margo Crawford <margaretc@vmware.com>
This also sets the CSRF cookie Secret's OwnerReference to the Pod's grandparent
Deployment so that when the Deployment is cleaned up, then the Secret is as
well.
Obviously this controller implementation has a lot of issues, but it will at
least get us started.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This default matches the static client we have defined in the supervisor, which will be the correct value in most cases.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
We decided that we don't really need these in every case, since we'll be returning username and groups in a custom claim.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
This will allow it to be imported by Go code outside of our repository, which was something we have planned for since this code was written.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
I tried to follow a principle of encapsulation here - we can still default to
peeps making connections to 80/443 on a Service object, but internally we will
use 8080/8443.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
- Setting a Secret in the supervisor's namespace with a special name
will cause it to get picked up and served as the supervisor's TLS
cert for any request which does not have a matching SNI cert.
- This is especially useful for when there is no DNS record for an
issuer and the user will be accessing it via IP address. This
is not how we would expect it to be used in production, but it
might be useful for other cases.
- Includes a new integration test
- Also suppress all of the warnings about ignoring the error returned by
Close() in lines like `defer x.Close()` to make GoLand happier
- TLS certificates can be configured on the OIDCProviderConfig using
the `secretName` field.
- When listening for incoming TLS connections, choose the TLS cert
based on the SNI hostname of the incoming request.
- Because SNI hostname information on incoming requests does not include
the port number of the request, we add a validation that
OIDCProviderConfigs where the issuer hostnames (not including port
number) are the same must use the same `secretName`.
- Note that this approach does not yet support requests made to an
IP address instead of a hostname. Also note that `localhost` is
considered a hostname by SNI.
- Add port 443 as a container port to the pod spec.
- A new controller watches for TLS secrets and caches them in memory.
That same in-memory cache is used while servicing incoming connections
on the TLS port.
- Make it easy to configure both port 443 and/or port 80 for various
Service types using our ytt templates for the supervisor.
- When deploying to kind, add another nodeport and forward it to the
host on another port to expose our new HTTPS supervisor port to the
host.
This was hidden behind a `pinniped alpha` hidden subcommand, but we're comfortable enough with the CLI flag interface now to promote it.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
Based on our experiences today with GKE, it will be easier for our users
to configure Ingress health checks if the healthz endpoint is available
on the same public port as the OIDC endpoints.
Also add an integration test for the healthz endpoint now that it is
public.
Also add the optional `containers[].ports.containerPort` to the
supervisor Deployment because the GKE docs say that GKE will look
at that field while inferring how to invoke the health endpoint. See
https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/concepts/ingress#def_inf_hc
Based on the spec, it seems like it's required that OAuth2 servers which do not support PKCE should just ignore the parameters, so this should always work.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
- The OIDCProviderConfigWatcherController synchronizes the
OIDCProviderConfig settings to dynamically mount and unmount the
OIDC discovery endpoints for each provider
- Integration test passes but unit tests need to be added still
3 main reasons:
- The cert and key that we store in this object are not always used for TLS.
- The package name "provider" was a little too generic.
- dynamiccert.Provider reads more go-ish than provider.DynamicCertProvider.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
New resource naming conventions:
- Do not repeat the Kind in the name,
e.g. do not call it foo-cluster-role-binding, just call it foo
- Names will generally start with a prefix to identify our component,
so when a user lists all objects of that kind, they can tell to which
component it is related,
e.g. `kubectl get configmaps` would list one named "pinniped-config"
- It should be possible for an operator to make the word "pinniped"
mostly disappear if they choose, by specifying the app_name in
values.yaml, to the extent that is practical (but not from APIService
names because those are hardcoded in golang)
- Each role/clusterrole and its corresponding binding have the same name
- Pinniped resource names that must be known by the server golang code
are passed to the code at run time via ConfigMap, rather than
hardcoded in the golang code. This also allows them to be prepended
with the app_name from values.yaml while creating the ConfigMap.
- Since the CLI `get-kubeconfig` command cannot guess the name of the
CredentialIssuerConfig resource in advance anymore, it lists all
CredentialIssuerConfig in the app's namespace and returns an error
if there is not exactly one found, and then uses that one regardless
of its name
- Add flag parsing and help messages for root command,
`exchange-credential` subcommand, and new `get-kubeconfig` subcommand
- The new `get-kubeconfig` subcommand is a work in progress in this
commit
- Also add here.Doc() and here.Docf() to enable nice heredocs in
our code
So I looked into other TokenReview webhook implementations, and most
of them just use the json stdlib package to unmarshal/marshal
TokenReview payloads. I'd say let's follow that pattern, even though
it leads to extra fields in the JSON payload (these are not harmful).
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
