This is a partial revert of 288d9c999e. For some reason it didn't occur to me
that we could do it this way earlier. Whoops.
This also contains a middleware update: mutation funcs can return an error now
and short-circuit the rest of the request/response flow. The idea here is that
if someone is configuring their kubeclient to use middleware, they are agreeing
to a narrow-er client contract by doing so (e.g., their TokenCredentialRequest's
must have an Spec.Authenticator.APIGroup set).
I also updated some internal/groupsuffix tests to be more realistic.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
I think the reason we were seeing flakes here is because the kube cert agent
pods had not reached a steady state even though our test assertions passed, so
the test would proceed immediately and run more assertions on top of a weird
state of the kube cert agent pods.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
I added that test helper to create an http.Request since I wanted to properly
initialize the http.Request's context.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
This allows us to keep all of our resources in the pinniped category
while not having kubectl return errors for calls such as:
kubectl get pinniped -A
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mok@vmware.com>
As of upgrading to Kubernetes 1.20, our aggregated API server nows runs some
controllers for the two flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io resources in the title of
this commit, so it needs RBAC to read them.
This should get rid of the following error messages in our Concierge logs:
Failed to watch *v1beta1.FlowSchema: failed to list *v1beta1.FlowSchema: flowschemas.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:concierge:concierge" cannot list resource "flowschemas" in API group "flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io" at the cluster scope
Failed to watch *v1beta1.PriorityLevelConfiguration: failed to list *v1beta1.PriorityLevelConfiguration: prioritylevelconfigurations.flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:concierge:concierge" cannot list resource "prioritylevelconfigurations" in API group "flowcontrol.apiserver.k8s.io" at the cluster scope
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
I messed this up before because the ordering of the path components is a bit different than in the specific version case.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
When the Pinniped server has been installed with the `api_group_suffix`
option, for example using `mysuffix.com`, then clients who would like to
submit a `TokenCredentialRequest` to the server should set the
`Spec.Authenticator.APIGroup` field as `authentication.concierge.mysuffix.com`.
This makes more sense from the client's point of view than using the
default `authentication.concierge.pinniped.dev` because
`authentication.concierge.mysuffix.com` is the name of the API group
that they can observe their cluster and `authentication.concierge.pinniped.dev`
does not exist as an API group on their cluster.
This commit includes both the client and server-side changes to make
this work, as well as integration test updates.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
Co-authored-by: Margo Crawford <margaretc@vmware.com>
Makes it easy to deploy Pinniped under a different API group for manual
testing and iterating on integration tests on your laptop.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Richard <richardry@vmware.com>
Because it is a test of the conciergeclient package, and the naming
convention for integration test files is supervisor_*_test.go,
concierge_*_test.go, or cli_*_test.go to identify which component
the test is primarily covering.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Keesler <akeesler@vmware.com>
Monis Khan