Our unit test command is going to get slighly more complex in a future revision. This should let us avoid having to sync the CI pipeline definition so many times.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
- Also, don't repeat `spec.Parallel()` because, according to the docs
for the spec package, "options are inherited by subgroups and subspecs"
- Two tests are left pending to be filled in on the next commit
- `Before` gives a nice place to call `require.New(t)` to make the assertion lines more terse
- Just delete the keys for testing when env vars are missing
This is kind of a subtle bug, but we were using the unversioned Kubernetes type package here, where we should have been using the v1beta1 version. They have the same fields, but they serialize to JSON differently.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
The type signatures of these methods make them easy to mix up. `require.Error()` asserts that there is any non-nil error -- the last parameter is an optional human-readable message to log when the assertion fails. `require.EqualError()` asserts that there is a non-nil error _and_ that when you call `err.Error()`, the string matches the expected value. It also takes an additional optional parameter to specify the log message.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
Again, no idea why but this word has two commonly accepted spelling and Go code seems to very consistently use the one with one "l".
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
The error was:
```
internal/certauthority/certauthority.go:68:15: err113: do not define dynamic errors, use wrapped static errors instead: "fmt.Errorf(\"expected CA to be a single certificate, found %d certificates\", certCount)" (goerr113)
return nil, fmt.Errorf("expected CA to be a single certificate, found %d certificates", certCount)
^
exit status 1
```
I'm not sure if I love this err113 linter.
It turns out these fields are not meant to be base64 encoded, even though that's how they are in the kubeconfig.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
I think we may still split this apart into multiple packages, but for now it works pretty well in both use cases.
Signed-off-by: Matt Moyer <moyerm@vmware.com>
- Dynamically grant RBAC permission to the test user to allow them
to make read requests via the API
- Then use the credential returned from the LoginRequest to make a
request back to the API server which should be successful
